<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 43 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10341</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying the applicant&#039;s exemption claim under section 54(1) of the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized the requirement for ownership unity between the residential house and the land appurtenant for the exemption to apply. Since the land sold and the house did not belong to the same person, the exemption was deemed unavailable. The court&#039;s decision clarified the conditions for claiming exemptions and highlighted the significance of ownership unity in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 43 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10341</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying the applicant&#039;s exemption claim under section 54(1) of the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized the requirement for ownership unity between the residential house and the land appurtenant for the exemption to apply. Since the land sold and the house did not belong to the same person, the exemption was deemed unavailable. The court&#039;s decision clarified the conditions for claiming exemptions and highlighted the significance of ownership unity in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>