<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1634 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195338</link>
    <description>The ITAT, Ahmedabad, upheld the disallowance of exemption under section 54 of the IT Act but dismissed the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(C). The decision was based on the principle that if the quantum appeal is allowed, the penalty cannot be levied. The judgment was pronounced on 14/12/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:02:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1634 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195338</link>
      <description>The ITAT, Ahmedabad, upheld the disallowance of exemption under section 54 of the IT Act but dismissed the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(C). The decision was based on the principle that if the quantum appeal is allowed, the penalty cannot be levied. The judgment was pronounced on 14/12/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>