<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 2044 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order, emphasizing the lack of evidence for clandestine removal, the questionable validity of Panch witnesses, and procedural lapses violating natural justice principles. The respondents were entitled to consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 2044 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order, emphasizing the lack of evidence for clandestine removal, the questionable validity of Panch witnesses, and procedural lapses violating natural justice principles. The respondents were entitled to consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>