<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 46 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10340</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad interpreted the term &#039;house&#039; under section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 to include the entire area of land surrounding the residential property, rejecting the argument that only land appurtenant to the house should be considered. The Court emphasized the historical treatment of such properties as single residential units and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 46 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10340</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad interpreted the term &#039;house&#039; under section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 to include the entire area of land surrounding the residential property, rejecting the argument that only land appurtenant to the house should be considered. The Court emphasized the historical treatment of such properties as single residential units and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>