<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1171 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195349</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application under section 9 of IBC, 2016 for default in payment, finding no valid dispute raised by the respondent. An interim insolvency professional was appointed to manage the corporate debtor, with a moratorium declared to protect the debtor from legal actions. The insolvency resolution process was set in motion, with the Registry directed to ensure compliance with the order and inform relevant parties accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1171 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195349</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application under section 9 of IBC, 2016 for default in payment, finding no valid dispute raised by the respondent. An interim insolvency professional was appointed to manage the corporate debtor, with a moratorium declared to protect the debtor from legal actions. The insolvency resolution process was set in motion, with the Registry directed to ensure compliance with the order and inform relevant parties accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>