<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1490 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195351</link>
    <description>Pending adjudication was considered in the context of the Master Circular on call book cases, but no substantive direction was issued on keeping the matter in abeyance. The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to place the circular before the adjudicating authority, leaving the authority to consider the request at that stage. No further orders were passed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:02:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1490 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195351</link>
      <description>Pending adjudication was considered in the context of the Master Circular on call book cases, but no substantive direction was issued on keeping the matter in abeyance. The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to place the circular before the adjudicating authority, leaving the authority to consider the request at that stage. No further orders were passed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>