https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195335 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the penalty orders imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act. It was held that the penalty was unjustified as the authorized representative attended assessment proceedings diligently, no habitual non-compliance was found, and assessments were completed without any issues. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty was wrongly imposed and upheld by the lower authorities, ruling in favor of the assessee. en-us Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:02:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195335 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the penalty orders imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act. It was held that the penalty was unjustified as the authorized representative attended assessment proceedings diligently, no habitual non-compliance was found, and assessments were completed without any issues. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty was wrongly imposed and upheld by the lower authorities, ruling in favor of the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195335