https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195333 Section 15(4) of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 was construed to permit the appellate authority to make further inquiry and receive additional evidence where the pleadings and facts justified it. The Court found the evidence was properly admitted, the tenant had an opportunity to meet it, and no prejudice was shown. On bona fide requirement under section 13(3)(a)(i), the landlord's need was held genuine because the ancestral accommodation was inadequate and the earlier house near Kabir Bhavan was not shown to be available in a way that defeated the claim. The eviction order was therefore confirmed. en-us Thu, 11 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:17:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195333 Section 15(4) of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 was construed to permit the appellate authority to make further inquiry and receive additional evidence where the pleadings and facts justified it. The Court found the evidence was properly admitted, the tenant had an opportunity to meet it, and no prejudice was shown. On bona fide requirement under section 13(3)(a)(i), the landlord's need was held genuine because the ancestral accommodation was inadequate and the earlier house near Kabir Bhavan was not shown to be available in a way that defeated the claim. The eviction order was therefore confirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195333