https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195333 The Supreme Court upheld the appellate authority's decision to admit additional evidence and found the landlord's requirement under section 13(3)(a)(i) of the Act to be bona fide. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no prejudice was caused by the admission of evidence and rejecting claims of a benami transaction. The High Court's dismissal of the revision petition was affirmed, and the appeal was dismissed without costs. en-us Thu, 11 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:17:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195333 The Supreme Court upheld the appellate authority's decision to admit additional evidence and found the landlord's requirement under section 13(3)(a)(i) of the Act to be bona fide. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no prejudice was caused by the admission of evidence and rejecting claims of a benami transaction. The High Court's dismissal of the revision petition was affirmed, and the appeal was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195333