<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 10 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10333</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that deductions under section 36(1)(viii) do not impact the computation of deductions under section 80M of the Income-tax Act. It affirmed that the benefit under section 80M should be calculated based on gross dividend income, independent of deductions under section 36(1)(viii). The appeal was dismissed, concluding that the provisions are separate, and the Tribunal&#039;s approach was deemed correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 10 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10333</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that deductions under section 36(1)(viii) do not impact the computation of deductions under section 80M of the Income-tax Act. It affirmed that the benefit under section 80M should be calculated based on gross dividend income, independent of deductions under section 36(1)(viii). The appeal was dismissed, concluding that the provisions are separate, and the Tribunal&#039;s approach was deemed correct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>