<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1009 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349854</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s quashing of the assessment under section 158BD was upheld due to jurisdictional and procedural issues. The assessment order dated 28 July 2005 was deemed invalid and barred by the statutory limitation period. The High Court found no fault in the Tribunal&#039;s approach, answering the questions of law against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1009 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349854</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s quashing of the assessment under section 158BD was upheld due to jurisdictional and procedural issues. The assessment order dated 28 July 2005 was deemed invalid and barred by the statutory limitation period. The High Court found no fault in the Tribunal&#039;s approach, answering the questions of law against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>