<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 995 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349840</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s orders under Section 263 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2011-12 and 2013-14, holding that the CIT did not have valid grounds to invoke his revisionary jurisdiction as there were no incriminating materials found during the search. The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, confirming that the original assessments were not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:37:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 995 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349840</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s orders under Section 263 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2011-12 and 2013-14, holding that the CIT did not have valid grounds to invoke his revisionary jurisdiction as there were no incriminating materials found during the search. The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, confirming that the original assessments were not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>