<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 991 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349836</link>
    <description>The High Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal challenging the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order on the exemption from customs duty on printing ink imports for currency notes. The Court determined that the appeal directly pertained to the rate of customs duty under Notification 40/2006, directing the appellant to approach the Supreme Court under Section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962 for further adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:37:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 991 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349836</link>
      <description>The High Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal challenging the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order on the exemption from customs duty on printing ink imports for currency notes. The Court determined that the appeal directly pertained to the rate of customs duty under Notification 40/2006, directing the appellant to approach the Supreme Court under Section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962 for further adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>