<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 983 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349828</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue against the penalty reduction from Rs. 50,00,000 to Rs. 2,00,000 for smuggling Red Sandal was dismissed. The court upheld the decision to reduce the penalty, citing the lack of concrete evidence beyond the truck driver&#039;s statement implicating the respondent. The judgment emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence and clear delineation of roles in determining penalties in smuggling cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:37:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 983 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349828</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue against the penalty reduction from Rs. 50,00,000 to Rs. 2,00,000 for smuggling Red Sandal was dismissed. The court upheld the decision to reduce the penalty, citing the lack of concrete evidence beyond the truck driver&#039;s statement implicating the respondent. The judgment emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence and clear delineation of roles in determining penalties in smuggling cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>