<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 955 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349800</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD, through the judgment delivered by Member (Judicial), allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC for the delayed payment of excise duty. The judgment emphasized the importance of adherence to show cause notices and the absence of suppression of fact or malafide intention in the case at hand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:34:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 955 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349800</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD, through the judgment delivered by Member (Judicial), allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC for the delayed payment of excise duty. The judgment emphasized the importance of adherence to show cause notices and the absence of suppression of fact or malafide intention in the case at hand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>