https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349798 The tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal in a case concerning the rejection of a refund claim under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 due to multiple filings in a month. The tribunal held that while the monthly filing requirement is important, mere multiple filings should not automatically lead to rejection. It suggested adjusting the refund amount if excess claims were made in subsequent filings. The tribunal emphasized the need for proper verification before refund sanctioning and granted the adjudicating authority the liberty to ensure compliance with all aspects before granting the refund. en-us Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:34:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349798 The tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal in a case concerning the rejection of a refund claim under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 due to multiple filings in a month. The tribunal held that while the monthly filing requirement is important, mere multiple filings should not automatically lead to rejection. It suggested adjusting the refund amount if excess claims were made in subsequent filings. The tribunal emphasized the need for proper verification before refund sanctioning and granted the adjudicating authority the liberty to ensure compliance with all aspects before granting the refund. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349798