<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1157 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195304</link>
    <description>Seizure of goods and vehicle, and the resulting tax and penalty demand, cannot rest on bare suspicion of undervaluation when the consignment is supported by transport documents and declarations. The Patna HC noted that the statutory power to verify transit goods applies only on reasonable grounds based on material showing that the declaration is incomplete or incorrect. Here, the officer enhanced the declared value without cogent reason or supporting evidence, and the record disclosed no basis for inferring deliberate undervaluation. In the absence of material showing contravention, the seizure and consequential demand were held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:33:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1157 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195304</link>
      <description>Seizure of goods and vehicle, and the resulting tax and penalty demand, cannot rest on bare suspicion of undervaluation when the consignment is supported by transport documents and declarations. The Patna HC noted that the statutory power to verify transit goods applies only on reasonable grounds based on material showing that the declaration is incomplete or incorrect. Here, the officer enhanced the declared value without cogent reason or supporting evidence, and the record disclosed no basis for inferring deliberate undervaluation. In the absence of material showing contravention, the seizure and consequential demand were held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>