<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1718 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195313</link>
    <description>The Gujarat High Court, under the direction of Honourable Smt. Justice Abhilasha Kumari, granted dispensation of meetings of Equity Shareholders and Unsecured Creditors in a Scheme of Arrangement for Excellent Glass and Ceramic Private Limited. All Equity Shareholders and the sole Unsecured Creditor had provided written consent, supported by certificates from a Chartered Accountant. The Court, satisfied with the evidence, dispensed with the physical meetings, emphasizing the importance of obtaining valid consent from stakeholders in corporate transactions. This decision underscores the efficiency of the legal process when parties comply with procedural requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:33:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1718 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195313</link>
      <description>The Gujarat High Court, under the direction of Honourable Smt. Justice Abhilasha Kumari, granted dispensation of meetings of Equity Shareholders and Unsecured Creditors in a Scheme of Arrangement for Excellent Glass and Ceramic Private Limited. All Equity Shareholders and the sole Unsecured Creditor had provided written consent, supported by certificates from a Chartered Accountant. The Court, satisfied with the evidence, dispensed with the physical meetings, emphasizing the importance of obtaining valid consent from stakeholders in corporate transactions. This decision underscores the efficiency of the legal process when parties comply with procedural requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>