<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1252 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195318</link>
    <description>Recusal requires a real conflict of interest or personal disqualification, not unsubstantiated allegations raised after adverse orders. On the facts discussed, allegations against the Judge and Registry arose from official acts in earlier proceedings, and no ground for recusal was made out. The text also states that wild, reckless and scurrilous allegations in pleadings and publications, coupled with attempts to browbeat the Court and secure favourable orders through false proceedings, may amount to abuse of process and contempt. The Court accordingly proceeded to initiate contempt action, frame draft charges, and impose interim protective restraints pending further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:33:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1252 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195318</link>
      <description>Recusal requires a real conflict of interest or personal disqualification, not unsubstantiated allegations raised after adverse orders. On the facts discussed, allegations against the Judge and Registry arose from official acts in earlier proceedings, and no ground for recusal was made out. The text also states that wild, reckless and scurrilous allegations in pleadings and publications, coupled with attempts to browbeat the Court and secure favourable orders through false proceedings, may amount to abuse of process and contempt. The Court accordingly proceeded to initiate contempt action, frame draft charges, and impose interim protective restraints pending further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>