<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1128 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195320</link>
    <description>Leave was granted in the special leave petitions, but no stay was issued. The dispute was allowed to continue before the Company Law Board in accordance with law, preserving the ongoing proceedings without interim restraint. The order is procedural and does not record any substantive determination on the merits of the corporate law controversy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1128 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195320</link>
      <description>Leave was granted in the special leave petitions, but no stay was issued. The dispute was allowed to continue before the Company Law Board in accordance with law, preserving the ongoing proceedings without interim restraint. The order is procedural and does not record any substantive determination on the merits of the corporate law controversy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>