https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195297 An injunction passed by a court with jurisdiction remains binding until it is vacated or otherwise ceases in law, so an alienation made in deliberate breach of that restraint is not legally effective and may be treated as unlawful. The legality of such a transfer also raises a real question of law affecting the parties' rights, so it cannot be rejected as lacking a substantial question of law. The summary dismissal of the second appeal was therefore unsustainable, and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal after framing the appropriate substantial question of law. en-us Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Oct 2017 18:03:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195297 An injunction passed by a court with jurisdiction remains binding until it is vacated or otherwise ceases in law, so an alienation made in deliberate breach of that restraint is not legally effective and may be treated as unlawful. The legality of such a transfer also raises a real question of law affecting the parties' rights, so it cannot be rejected as lacking a substantial question of law. The summary dismissal of the second appeal was therefore unsustainable, and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal after framing the appropriate substantial question of law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195297