https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195294 The Supreme Court held that G.O.Ms. No.126 applied prospectively to existing employees and did not extend benefits to retired employees. The Court dismissed claims by retired employees due to delay and lack of legitimate expectation for retrospective benefits, emphasizing that legitimate expectation must align with existing statutes and Article 14 does not guarantee post-retirement benefits. The appeals were allowed, setting aside the High Court's judgment and affirming the rational classification of employees based on service status. en-us Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:50:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195294 The Supreme Court held that G.O.Ms. No.126 applied prospectively to existing employees and did not extend benefits to retired employees. The Court dismissed claims by retired employees due to delay and lack of legitimate expectation for retrospective benefits, emphasizing that legitimate expectation must align with existing statutes and Article 14 does not guarantee post-retirement benefits. The appeals were allowed, setting aside the High Court's judgment and affirming the rational classification of employees based on service status. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195294