https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195293 Allegations of manipulated records, altered control, illegal allotments and fabricated minutes were treated as relating to share control and management, so the petition fell within Section 398(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 and was maintainable. However, because an earlier civil suit already covered substantially identical issues and reliefs, the Board stayed the petition to avoid conflicting decisions. The merits were not adjudicated, and the parties were left to continue the civil proceedings with liberty to revive the petition later if advised. en-us Tue, 01 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:41:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195293 Allegations of manipulated records, altered control, illegal allotments and fabricated minutes were treated as relating to share control and management, so the petition fell within Section 398(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 and was maintainable. However, because an earlier civil suit already covered substantially identical issues and reliefs, the Board stayed the petition to avoid conflicting decisions. The merits were not adjudicated, and the parties were left to continue the civil proceedings with liberty to revive the petition later if advised. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 01 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195293