<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 472 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195289</link>
    <description>The judgment dismissed the petition under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, as the grievances were deemed general and not sufficient. It emphasized substantial justice and directed the constitution of a new board of directors for fair representation and effective management of the Company&#039;s affairs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:39:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 472 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195289</link>
      <description>The judgment dismissed the petition under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, as the grievances were deemed general and not sufficient. It emphasized substantial justice and directed the constitution of a new board of directors for fair representation and effective management of the Company&#039;s affairs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>