<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 632 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195285</link>
    <description>Order 39 Rule 3 CPC was treated as applicable in principle to ex parte injunctions on the Original Side, but the Chartered High Court&#039;s power under Clause 37 of the Letters Patent and Section 129 CPC allows its own original-side rules to govern where not inconsistent with the Code. Chapter XX Rule 3 of the Original Side Rules permits ex parte relief where delay may cause irreparable or serious mischief and does not require recorded reasons. Non-recording of reasons or immediate service of copies therefore made the ex parte order vulnerable on appeal, but not void or a nullity, and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:59:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 632 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195285</link>
      <description>Order 39 Rule 3 CPC was treated as applicable in principle to ex parte injunctions on the Original Side, but the Chartered High Court&#039;s power under Clause 37 of the Letters Patent and Section 129 CPC allows its own original-side rules to govern where not inconsistent with the Code. Chapter XX Rule 3 of the Original Side Rules permits ex parte relief where delay may cause irreparable or serious mischief and does not require recorded reasons. Non-recording of reasons or immediate service of copies therefore made the ex parte order vulnerable on appeal, but not void or a nullity, and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>