<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1052 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195283</link>
    <description>Where a reference to arbitration is sought under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the forum must first address that objection and record prima facie reasons on its jurisdictional competence before granting interim relief. An interim order passed without dealing with the Section 8 application was held unsustainable and was set aside, with directions to decide the arbitration request and interim prayer together. The objection that the appeal was not maintainable because the company had not filed it was rejected, as the order operated against all respondents and the appellants were directly affected, giving them sufficient standing to challenge it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:53:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1052 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195283</link>
      <description>Where a reference to arbitration is sought under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the forum must first address that objection and record prima facie reasons on its jurisdictional competence before granting interim relief. An interim order passed without dealing with the Section 8 application was held unsustainable and was set aside, with directions to decide the arbitration request and interim prayer together. The objection that the appeal was not maintainable because the company had not filed it was rejected, as the order operated against all respondents and the appellants were directly affected, giving them sufficient standing to challenge it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>