https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195279 The Court, represented by Abhilasha Kumari J., held that separate proceedings under Section 391(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 are not necessary for the Transferee Company in the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. The Court found that as the Holding Company, the capital structure would remain unchanged, and existing shareholders' rights would not be affected. The Judges' Summons application was disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:23:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195279 The Court, represented by Abhilasha Kumari J., held that separate proceedings under Section 391(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 are not necessary for the Transferee Company in the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. The Court found that as the Holding Company, the capital structure would remain unchanged, and existing shareholders' rights would not be affected. The Judges' Summons application was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195279