<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 938 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed by the AO under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It found the issue debatable, ruled that the assessee did not conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars, and deemed the penalty unwarranted. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 938 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed by the AO under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It found the issue debatable, ruled that the assessee did not conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars, and deemed the penalty unwarranted. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>