https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349766 The Court allowed W.P.No.22770 of 2017, setting aside the show cause notices related to the levy of Anti-Dumping Duty (ADD) for specific periods. The petitioner was directed to cooperate with the adjudication process. W.P.No.22771 of 2017 was disposed of, granting the petitioner the liberty to pursue a refund application for ADD collected post the lapse of the principal notification, with the competent authority instructed to decide promptly in accordance with the law. The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner on maintainability of the writ petition and the invalidity of ADD levy based on a post-lapse amendment notification. en-us Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349766 The Court allowed W.P.No.22770 of 2017, setting aside the show cause notices related to the levy of Anti-Dumping Duty (ADD) for specific periods. The petitioner was directed to cooperate with the adjudication process. W.P.No.22771 of 2017 was disposed of, granting the petitioner the liberty to pursue a refund application for ADD collected post the lapse of the principal notification, with the competent authority instructed to decide promptly in accordance with the law. The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner on maintainability of the writ petition and the invalidity of ADD levy based on a post-lapse amendment notification. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349766