<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 913 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349758</link>
    <description>An application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code must be filed by a properly authorised representative; a mere power of attorney holder without specific authority to initiate insolvency proceedings is not competent to act. The Code is a complete regime for insolvency filings, so the general Power of Attorney Act cannot override its filing requirements, though a duly empowered officer or representative may file on the creditor&#039;s behalf. The defect in authorisation was also capable of being cured within the seven-day rectification period counted from receipt of notice, including Tribunal holidays, and the limitation objection failed. The insolvency application was therefore admitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 913 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349758</link>
      <description>An application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code must be filed by a properly authorised representative; a mere power of attorney holder without specific authority to initiate insolvency proceedings is not competent to act. The Code is a complete regime for insolvency filings, so the general Power of Attorney Act cannot override its filing requirements, though a duly empowered officer or representative may file on the creditor&#039;s behalf. The defect in authorisation was also capable of being cured within the seven-day rectification period counted from receipt of notice, including Tribunal holidays, and the limitation objection failed. The insolvency application was therefore admitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>