https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349757 The petition, originally filed under the Companies Act, 1956, was transferred to NCLT, Mumbai, under the I&B Code. The respondent's objections on transfer timing were dismissed. Legal objections on the petition's details were raised, but the petitioner argued they were belated. Dispute over the service date of the original petition arose, with doubts on authenticity. The petitioner demonstrated goods supply and payment default, leading to admission of the petition. An Interim Resolution Professional was appointed, initiating the CIRP with a moratorium period in place. The Tribunal's detailed analysis resulted in the admission of the petition and commencement of the resolution process. en-us Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349757 The petition, originally filed under the Companies Act, 1956, was transferred to NCLT, Mumbai, under the I&B Code. The respondent's objections on transfer timing were dismissed. Legal objections on the petition's details were raised, but the petitioner argued they were belated. Dispute over the service date of the original petition arose, with doubts on authenticity. The petitioner demonstrated goods supply and payment default, leading to admission of the petition. An Interim Resolution Professional was appointed, initiating the CIRP with a moratorium period in place. The Tribunal's detailed analysis resulted in the admission of the petition and commencement of the resolution process. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349757