https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349752 The tribunal found the search and seizure conducted on the appellant's premises to be illegal due to non-compliance with statutory requirements under Section 17(1) of the PMLA. The Adjudicating Authority's order allowing retention of seized documents was set aside, directing the return of the documents to the appellant. The appeal was allowed under section 26 of the PMLA, emphasizing the importance of strict compliance with statutory procedures in such actions. No costs were awarded, and the tribunal did not delve into the merits of other parties involved. en-us Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:16:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349752 The tribunal found the search and seizure conducted on the appellant's premises to be illegal due to non-compliance with statutory requirements under Section 17(1) of the PMLA. The Adjudicating Authority's order allowing retention of seized documents was set aside, directing the return of the documents to the appellant. The appeal was allowed under section 26 of the PMLA, emphasizing the importance of strict compliance with statutory procedures in such actions. No costs were awarded, and the tribunal did not delve into the merits of other parties involved. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349752