<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 901 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349746</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh adjudication. The Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the appellant&#039;s defenses without proper examination was deemed insufficient, emphasizing the necessity for a detailed review of the defenses and supporting documentation to ensure a fair decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:15:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 901 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349746</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh adjudication. The Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the appellant&#039;s defenses without proper examination was deemed insufficient, emphasizing the necessity for a detailed review of the defenses and supporting documentation to ensure a fair decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>