<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 898 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349743</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal regarding a refund claim under the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. The decision upheld the allowance of Cenvat credit on services pre-registration and car parking charges, following precedents set by High Court judgments and previous Tribunal orders. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistent application of legal principles in similar cases, ultimately denying the department&#039;s appeal based on existing jurisprudence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 898 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349743</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal regarding a refund claim under the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. The decision upheld the allowance of Cenvat credit on services pre-registration and car parking charges, following precedents set by High Court judgments and previous Tribunal orders. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistent application of legal principles in similar cases, ultimately denying the department&#039;s appeal based on existing jurisprudence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>