https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349738 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in an appeal against the imposition of differential duty, interest, and penalties. It held that since duty had already been paid by M/s ISGEC on the same goods, demanding duty from the job worker appellants would result in impermissible double taxation. The Tribunal emphasized revenue neutrality and fairness in duty imposition, setting aside the orders and ruling that no additional duty or penalty was payable by the appellants. en-us Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 10:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349738 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in an appeal against the imposition of differential duty, interest, and penalties. It held that since duty had already been paid by M/s ISGEC on the same goods, demanding duty from the job worker appellants would result in impermissible double taxation. The Tribunal emphasized revenue neutrality and fairness in duty imposition, setting aside the orders and ruling that no additional duty or penalty was payable by the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349738