<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 882 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349727</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Writ Petitions, set aside the impugned assessment orders, and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration. The respondent was directed to fix a date for a personal hearing, hear the petitioner in person, peruse the records, and redo the assessment in accordance with the law. The Court emphasized the importance of following principles of natural justice in such proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:14:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 882 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349727</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Writ Petitions, set aside the impugned assessment orders, and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration. The respondent was directed to fix a date for a personal hearing, hear the petitioner in person, peruse the records, and redo the assessment in accordance with the law. The Court emphasized the importance of following principles of natural justice in such proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>