<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 44 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10307</link>
    <description>Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 bars coercive recovery and execution proceedings against an industrial company while a statutory inquiry, rehabilitation scheme, or appeal is pending, unless the Board or Appellate Authority consents. Tax recovery notices issued under section 226(3) of the Income-tax Act are treated as execution-type proceedings and cannot proceed during that protective period without prior consent. The provision is mandatory and is intended to preserve the company&#039;s assets while revival proceedings are under consideration; otherwise, the statutory protection would be defeated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 44 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10307</link>
      <description>Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 bars coercive recovery and execution proceedings against an industrial company while a statutory inquiry, rehabilitation scheme, or appeal is pending, unless the Board or Appellate Authority consents. Tax recovery notices issued under section 226(3) of the Income-tax Act are treated as execution-type proceedings and cannot proceed during that protective period without prior consent. The provision is mandatory and is intended to preserve the company&#039;s assets while revival proceedings are under consideration; otherwise, the statutory protection would be defeated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>