<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 875 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195261</link>
    <description>The appellate court allowed the original side appeal, holding that the claim was not time-barred as the acknowledgment of liability in the E-mail renewed the limitation period. The court deemed the promissory note admissible for the winding-up petition, finding it maintainable due to the respondent company&#039;s admission of indebtedness and commercial insolvency. The matter was remitted for further proceedings on merits, overturning the single Judge&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 17:18:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 875 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195261</link>
      <description>The appellate court allowed the original side appeal, holding that the claim was not time-barred as the acknowledgment of liability in the E-mail renewed the limitation period. The court deemed the promissory note admissible for the winding-up petition, finding it maintainable due to the respondent company&#039;s admission of indebtedness and commercial insolvency. The matter was remitted for further proceedings on merits, overturning the single Judge&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>