<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (9) TMI 203 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195256</link>
    <description>A transfer by a member of a co-operative housing society of allotted shares, together with the superstructure, is exempt from compulsory registration under Section 42(a) of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act when the society is a tenant co-partnership society, because the land and superstructure vest in the society and the member transfers only the associated contractual and beneficial rights of occupation. In a tenant ownership society, however, a member may hold a personal interest in the superstructure or other immovable property, and that transfer is outside the exemption and requires a registered conveyance. On the facts stated, the transfer was treated as valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (9) TMI 203 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195256</link>
      <description>A transfer by a member of a co-operative housing society of allotted shares, together with the superstructure, is exempt from compulsory registration under Section 42(a) of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act when the society is a tenant co-partnership society, because the land and superstructure vest in the society and the member transfers only the associated contractual and beneficial rights of occupation. In a tenant ownership society, however, a member may hold a personal interest in the superstructure or other immovable property, and that transfer is outside the exemption and requires a registered conveyance. On the facts stated, the transfer was treated as valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>