https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195255 An efficacious statutory appeal under the SARFAESI Act generally bars recourse to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 when the borrower can pursue the alternative appellate remedy after rejection of the Section 17 application. The High Court will ordinarily decline to entertain a writ petition or writ appeal in such circumstances, particularly where precedent recognises that an effective statutory remedy should not be bypassed except in limited exceptional cases. The operative result stated in the text is that the writ appeal was not maintainable on merits and the dismissal of the writ petition for availability of an alternative remedy was upheld. en-us Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:27:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195255 An efficacious statutory appeal under the SARFAESI Act generally bars recourse to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 when the borrower can pursue the alternative appellate remedy after rejection of the Section 17 application. The High Court will ordinarily decline to entertain a writ petition or writ appeal in such circumstances, particularly where precedent recognises that an effective statutory remedy should not be bypassed except in limited exceptional cases. The operative result stated in the text is that the writ appeal was not maintainable on merits and the dismissal of the writ petition for availability of an alternative remedy was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195255