<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 870 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349715</link>
    <description>The court rejected the application for stay of demand due to lack of specific grounds. The petitioner was directed to submit a fresh application to the Assessing Officer within three weeks for proper consideration. The Assessing Officer was ordered to decide on the fresh application within one month. The court emphasized that the fresh application would be evaluated on its own merits, ensuring a fair review of the petitioner&#039;s request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:37:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 870 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349715</link>
      <description>The court rejected the application for stay of demand due to lack of specific grounds. The petitioner was directed to submit a fresh application to the Assessing Officer within three weeks for proper consideration. The Assessing Officer was ordered to decide on the fresh application within one month. The court emphasized that the fresh application would be evaluated on its own merits, ensuring a fair review of the petitioner&#039;s request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>