<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 867 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349712</link>
    <description>The court set aside the cancellation of registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the need to assess the overall genuineness of a trust&#039;s activities beyond a single alleged bogus donation. It highlighted the distinction between isolated incidents and a pattern of non-genuine activities, allowing the department to investigate further without the current order hindering the process. The judgment focused on upholding natural justice principles and remanded the matter for cross-examination, without addressing the retrospective effect of the cancellation. Costs were not awarded, enabling the department to pursue additional investigations to determine the trust&#039;s genuineness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 867 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349712</link>
      <description>The court set aside the cancellation of registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the need to assess the overall genuineness of a trust&#039;s activities beyond a single alleged bogus donation. It highlighted the distinction between isolated incidents and a pattern of non-genuine activities, allowing the department to investigate further without the current order hindering the process. The judgment focused on upholding natural justice principles and remanded the matter for cross-examination, without addressing the retrospective effect of the cancellation. Costs were not awarded, enabling the department to pursue additional investigations to determine the trust&#039;s genuineness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>