https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349709 A government servant whose case was correctly placed in a sealed cover at the DPC stage because he was under suspension could not claim opening of the cover or promotion merely on revocation of suspension. The Office Memorandum of 14 September 1992 applied because a later charge-sheet and pending disciplinary proceedings triggered the para 7 embargo, requiring the employee to be treated as if the case remained in sealed cover until complete exoneration. The revocation of suspension was not a clean chit, and the Tribunal's contrary direction was unsustainable. en-us Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349709 A government servant whose case was correctly placed in a sealed cover at the DPC stage because he was under suspension could not claim opening of the cover or promotion merely on revocation of suspension. The Office Memorandum of 14 September 1992 applied because a later charge-sheet and pending disciplinary proceedings triggered the para 7 embargo, requiring the employee to be treated as if the case remained in sealed cover until complete exoneration. The revocation of suspension was not a clean chit, and the Tribunal's contrary direction was unsustainable. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349709