<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s request for shipping bill conversion shouldn&#039;t be denied solely due to lack of physical exam u/s 74.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36660</link>
    <description>Admittedly, no physical examination could be carried out. However, the same cannot be the sole reason for refusal of the request of the appellant for considering the claim for converting the shipping bill and to consider their request for drawback u/s 74</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:36:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:36:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s request for shipping bill conversion shouldn&#039;t be denied solely due to lack of physical exam u/s 74.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36660</link>
      <description>Admittedly, no physical examination could be carried out. However, the same cannot be the sole reason for refusal of the request of the appellant for considering the claim for converting the shipping bill and to consider their request for drawback u/s 74</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:36:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>