<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 862 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349707</link>
    <description>Interim relief was sought for release of locally procured goods and goods not covered by the seizure memorandum, and for a decision on whether a no objection certificate was required for import of the petitioner&#039;s products. The Court accepted the petitioner&#039;s assurance to produce supporting documents, directed prompt scrutiny of those documents, and ordered release of identified goods and articles in the godown not included in the seizure list. It also directed the customs authority to decide the pending representation on the no objection certificate requirement within the stipulated time, noting that no privilege had been claimed over the investigation papers in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:36:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 862 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349707</link>
      <description>Interim relief was sought for release of locally procured goods and goods not covered by the seizure memorandum, and for a decision on whether a no objection certificate was required for import of the petitioner&#039;s products. The Court accepted the petitioner&#039;s assurance to produce supporting documents, directed prompt scrutiny of those documents, and ordered release of identified goods and articles in the godown not included in the seizure list. It also directed the customs authority to decide the pending representation on the no objection certificate requirement within the stipulated time, noting that no privilege had been claimed over the investigation papers in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>