<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 860 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349705</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to release the detained gold and jewelry for re-export, subject to conditions set by the Commissioner (Appeals-I) and an undertaking to comply with the original order if the Department succeeded in the Revision. The respondent was given eight weeks to comply, allowing the Department to pursue its Revision Petition. No costs were awarded, and the Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 860 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349705</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to release the detained gold and jewelry for re-export, subject to conditions set by the Commissioner (Appeals-I) and an undertaking to comply with the original order if the Department succeeded in the Revision. The respondent was given eight weeks to comply, allowing the Department to pursue its Revision Petition. No costs were awarded, and the Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>