<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 859 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to grant interest on belated refunds and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the interest payment. The decision aligned with legal interpretations and precedents, including the start of the limitation period for refund claims from the date of subsequent sale of goods, not the initial payment date. Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument regarding a stay order from the High Court, the Tribunal found no merit in the appeal, as the issue of interest on delayed refunds had been independently examined and ruled in favor by the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:36:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 859 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to grant interest on belated refunds and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the interest payment. The decision aligned with legal interpretations and precedents, including the start of the limitation period for refund claims from the date of subsequent sale of goods, not the initial payment date. Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument regarding a stay order from the High Court, the Tribunal found no merit in the appeal, as the issue of interest on delayed refunds had been independently examined and ruled in favor by the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>