https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349699 The Court remitted the matter to the Original Authority for fresh consideration after the petitioner's appeal was rejected as time-barred in a case concerning a demand for service tax payment. The petitioner, a registered service provider, argued that the main contractor had already paid the service tax inclusive of their services, supported by challans. The Court emphasized the need for additional proof of service tax payment by contractors for the petitioner's services and directed the petitioner to submit all supporting documents within 15 days for a detailed review. en-us Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:36:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349699 The Court remitted the matter to the Original Authority for fresh consideration after the petitioner's appeal was rejected as time-barred in a case concerning a demand for service tax payment. The petitioner, a registered service provider, argued that the main contractor had already paid the service tax inclusive of their services, supported by challans. The Court emphasized the need for additional proof of service tax payment by contractors for the petitioner's services and directed the petitioner to submit all supporting documents within 15 days for a detailed review. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349699