<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 847 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349692</link>
    <description>A commission sales arrangement did not amount to clearing and forwarding agency service because the agent was appointed for consignment or commission sales, received goods already cleared by the principal, stored them and sold them, but was not required to clear goods from the principal. Applying the cited precedent, the activity fell outside the taxable category, so the service tax demand was unsustainable and the related interest and penalties could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:35:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 847 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349692</link>
      <description>A commission sales arrangement did not amount to clearing and forwarding agency service because the agent was appointed for consignment or commission sales, received goods already cleared by the principal, stored them and sold them, but was not required to clear goods from the principal. Applying the cited precedent, the activity fell outside the taxable category, so the service tax demand was unsustainable and the related interest and penalties could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>