<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 840 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349685</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of &quot;Tyre Machinery and Tyre Mould,&quot; regarding the denial of Cenvat credit on service tax paid on ESI, Insurance, and PF. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to the credit as the services received were &quot;Security and Man-power Supply Services,&quot; and the tax paid on these services was creditable. The Tribunal also clarified that the change in the definition of &quot;input service&quot; did not exclude credits for insurance for workers. The impugned orders were set aside, and all three appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:33:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 840 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349685</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of &quot;Tyre Machinery and Tyre Mould,&quot; regarding the denial of Cenvat credit on service tax paid on ESI, Insurance, and PF. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to the credit as the services received were &quot;Security and Man-power Supply Services,&quot; and the tax paid on these services was creditable. The Tribunal also clarified that the change in the definition of &quot;input service&quot; did not exclude credits for insurance for workers. The impugned orders were set aside, and all three appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>