<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 836 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349681</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on steel items used in fabrication of support structures or capital goods within the factory depends on the functional use test and on whether the fabricated structures qualify as parts, components, spares or accessories of capital goods. The claim could not be finally accepted on the existing record because the supporting Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate had not been produced before the lower authorities and the actual use of the goods required evidentiary verification. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh examination of the credit claim in light of the governing eligibility principle, with liberty to adduce evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2017 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 836 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349681</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on steel items used in fabrication of support structures or capital goods within the factory depends on the functional use test and on whether the fabricated structures qualify as parts, components, spares or accessories of capital goods. The claim could not be finally accepted on the existing record because the supporting Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate had not been produced before the lower authorities and the actual use of the goods required evidentiary verification. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh examination of the credit claim in light of the governing eligibility principle, with liberty to adduce evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>